From fe3bbb9b3de5001ba943d3be7109712847ec44ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Glisse Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 23:08:53 +0100 Subject: Fix various links for sphinx and some minor doc changes along the way. (why were we documenting a hasse diagram that doesn't exist?) --- src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst') diff --git a/src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst b/src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst index 40e94134..45ba5b3b 100644 --- a/src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst +++ b/src/python/doc/witness_complex_user.rst @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ which leads to definitions of **weak relaxed witness complex** (or just relaxed In particular case of 0-relaxation, weak complex corresponds to **witness complex** introduced in :cite:`de2004topological`, whereas 0-relaxed strong witness complex consists of just vertices and is not very interesting. Hence for small relaxation weak version is preferable. -However, to capture the homotopy type (for example using Gudhi::persistent_cohomology::Persistent_cohomology) it is +However, to capture the homotopy type (for example using :func:`gudhi.SimplexTree.persistence`) it is often necessary to work with higher filtration values. In this case strong relaxed witness complex is faster to compute and offers similar results. @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ The construction of the Euclidean versions of complexes follow the same scheme: In the non-Euclidean classes, the lists of nearest landmarks are supposed to be given as input. -The constructors take on the steps 1 and 2, while the function 'create_complex' executes the step 3. +The constructors take on the steps 1 and 2, while the function :func:`!create_complex` executes the step 3. Constructing weak relaxed witness complex from an off file ---------------------------------------------------------- -- cgit v1.2.3