From 0e17d3cc8b89fc9fae4f358bb6a8cedaeaff6f0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vrouvrea Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:32:14 +0000 Subject: Fix of duplicated vertices in list. Modify dimension computation. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svnroot/gudhi/branches/simplex_tree_insert_duplicated_vertices_fix_vincent@4107 636b058d-ea47-450e-bf9e-a15bfbe3eedb Former-commit-id: e6ac9ee4c9d34e59c07d9f5b16b13b5151608009 --- src/Simplex_tree/include/gudhi/Simplex_tree.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/Simplex_tree/include') diff --git a/src/Simplex_tree/include/gudhi/Simplex_tree.h b/src/Simplex_tree/include/gudhi/Simplex_tree.h index 4b18651c..6bb42037 100644 --- a/src/Simplex_tree/include/gudhi/Simplex_tree.h +++ b/src/Simplex_tree/include/gudhi/Simplex_tree.h @@ -787,19 +787,22 @@ class Simplex_tree { private: /// Same as insert_simplex_and_subfaces but assumes that the range of vertices is sorted template> - std::pair insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(const ForwardVertexRange& Nsimplex, Filtration_value filt = 0) { + std::pair insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(const ForwardVertexRange& Nsimplex, + Filtration_value filt = 0) { auto first = std::begin(Nsimplex); auto last = std::end(Nsimplex); if (first == last) return { null_simplex(), true }; // FIXME: false would make more sense to me. GUDHI_CHECK(std::is_sorted(first, last), "simplex vertices listed in unsorted order"); - // Update dimension if needed. We could wait to see if the insertion succeeds, but I doubt there is much to gain. - dimension_ = (std::max)(dimension_, static_cast(std::distance(first, last)) - 1); - return rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(root(), first, last, filt); + return rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(root(), first, last, filt, 0); } // To insert {1,2,3,4}, we insert {2,3,4} twice, once at the root, and once below 1. template - std::pair rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(Siblings* sib, ForwardVertexIterator first, ForwardVertexIterator last, Filtration_value filt) { + std::pair rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(Siblings* sib, + ForwardVertexIterator first, + ForwardVertexIterator last, + Filtration_value filt, + int dimension) { // An alternative strategy would be: // - try to find the complete simplex, if found (and low filtration) exit // - insert all the vertices at once in sib @@ -811,19 +814,30 @@ class Simplex_tree { bool one_is_new = insertion_result.second; if (!one_is_new) { if (filtration(simplex_one) > filt) { - assign_filtration(simplex_one, filt); + assign_filtration(simplex_one, filt); } else { - // FIXME: this interface makes no sense, and it doesn't seem to be tested. - insertion_result.first = null_simplex(); + // FIXME: this interface makes no sense, and it doesn't seem to be tested. + insertion_result.first = null_simplex(); } } - if (++first == last) return insertion_result; + // Next iteration to avoid consecutive equal values + while ((vertex_one == *first) && (first < last)) { + ++first; + } + // End of insertion + if (first == last) { + dimension_ = (std::max)(dimension_, dimension); + return insertion_result; + } if (!has_children(simplex_one)) // TODO: have special code here, we know we are building the whole subtree from scratch. simplex_one->second.assign_children(new Siblings(sib, vertex_one)); - auto res = rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(simplex_one->second.children(), first, last, filt); + ++dimension; + auto res = rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(simplex_one->second.children(), first, last, filt, dimension); // No need to continue if the full simplex was already there with a low enough filtration value. - if (res.first != null_simplex()) rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(sib, first, last, filt); + if (res.first != null_simplex()) { + rec_insert_simplex_and_subfaces_sorted(sib, first, last, filt, dimension); + } return res; } -- cgit v1.2.3